Decision IV/7 on Forest Biological Diversity
1. What is the relative priority afforded to implementation of this
decision by your country?
a) High X (Fl, Wa)
b) Medium X (Bxl)
c) Low
Comments on question 1 (priority afforded to implementation)
None.
2. To what extent are the resources available adequate for meeting the
obligations and recommendations made?
a) Good
b) Adequate X
c) Limiting
d) Severely limiting X (Bxl)
Comments on question 2 (availability of resources)
None.
3. Has your country assessed the status and trends of its forest
biological diversity and identified options for its conservation and
sustainable use? (Decision IV/7, paragraph 12)
a) no
b) assessment underway (please give details below) X (Wa, Bxl)
c) assessment completed (please give details below) X (Fl)
d) not relevant
Comments on question 3 (status and trends)
The latest official forest assessment at the national level dates back to
1980 and only concerns publicly owned forests. Since then, regional forest
inventories have been carried out on a periodical basis and include
information on the status and trends of forest biological diversity.
Flanders:
The Flemish Region started its first permanent inventory in 1997. This forest
inventory relies upon systematic sampling according to a 1 km by 0,5 km grid
for forest data, a 1 km by 1 km grid for vegetation data and a 2 km by 2 km
grid for soil data. These grids match the 4 km by 4 km grid of the Flemish
part of the 'European Forest Condition Survey'. The first report of the
permanent inventory was published in 2001 (ref. #2). It contains a detailed
phyto-sociological description and characterisation of the forest vegetation
types in Flanders.
For more information, see Belgium's Voluntary Report to UNFF-2:
· § 2.1.5.1.3 - The Flemish Forest Inventory as the basis for a MAR-concept
based on Criteria & Indicators for sustainable forest management.
Very general and broad options for conservation and sustainable use of
forest biological diversity were taken when the Flemish Government Act on
Forests (Bosdecreet, 1990) was developed and modified (e.g. importance of
management plans, general protection measures). The recent "Nature Report
2001" contains a chapter on state and evolution of nature values of
forests in Flanders (ref. #9). See also question
5.
Wallonia:
A first exhaustive forest assessment of Walloon forests was carried out
between 1979 and 1983 and provided information on species composition, areas
and volumes. The "Permanent Forest Inventory of Wallonia" was
started in 1994 and was institutionalised by decree in 1995. It relies upon
systematic sampling according to a 1 km by 0,5 km grid. One-tenth of this grid
is covered each year, which means that the total grid is covered over a
ten-year period. The 10% of plots inventoried each year are distributed
regularly over the Walloon territory.
The objectives of the Walloon inventory were widened in 1997, in order to
include the assessment of forest biodiversity and sustainable management
practices. The new parameters are based on criteria and indicators of
Resolution L2 of the Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in
Europe. They include: the area of natural and semi-natural forests, areas of
specially managed forests, areas of mixed forest stands with 2-3 species,
proportion of naturally regenerated stands (ref. # 11).
For more information, see Belgium's Voluntary Report to UNFF-2:
· § 3.1.4. - Wallonia. Criteria and indicators for sustainable management of
forests.
Wallonia produced an assessment of the management of its forests in
response of its commitment to the implementation of Helsinki and Lisbon
resolutions (ref. #10). The first part of the report describes the main
characteristics of forests, as well as the legal and institutional framework
of forest policy in Wallonia. The second part of the report illustrates forest
management as it is carried out in Wallonia, using criteria and indicators
determined by the Helsinki resolutions. Objectives and targets for sustainable
forest management are identified both for publicly- and privately-owned
forests. See also question 5.
Brussels:
A forest inventory is carried out every year in the Brussels Capital Region.
Forest biodiversity is slowly but increasingly being taken into account in
the forest management plans, which have for objective sustainable forest
management as accepted by Belgium following the Ministerial Conference on the
Protection of Forests in Europe in Helsinki in 1993.
Summarized information on forest resources in Belgium:
The distribution of forests in Belgium is shown in Table 1. Most of the forest
area is located in the Walloon Region. The State, regions and provinces own
13% of the forests, 32% belongs to municipalities, 2% to public establishments
and 53% to private individuals. Privately owned forests in Belgium are
characterized by their fragmentary nature and are divided among some 120,000
owners (i.e. on average 2.7 ha per owner).
Broadleaved species account for about half the forest area, the main
species being oaks (Quercus robur, Q. petraea) and beech (Fagus
sylvatica). The main coniferous species are Norway spruce (Picea abies),
Scots and Black pine (Pinus sylvestris, P. nigra), larch (Larix
decidua) and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menzeisii). Norway spruce
plantations account for about 75% of conifer species in Wallonia, while Scots
Pine is the most frequent conifer species in Flanders (about 65%).
Table 1: Forest cover in Belgium.
|
Area (km˛) |
Forest area (km˛) |
% of the area |
% of the forest area |
| Flemish region |
13 521 |
1 352 |
9.9 |
19.8 |
| Walloon region |
16 845 |
5 448 |
32.3 |
79.9 |
| Brussels region |
162 |
20 |
12.3 |
0.3 |
| Belgium |
30 528 |
6 820 |
22.3 |
100.0 |
If a developing country Party or a Party with economy in transition -
4.
Has your country requested assistance through the financial mechanism for
projects that promote the implementation of the focused work programme on
forest biological diversity? (Decision IV/7, paragraph 7)
a) no Not relevant
b) yes (please give details below)
Comments on question 4 (developing countries and economies in transition)
Not relevant.