Background and context
The Belgian Focal Point to the GTI
Calls for proposals
Background and context
"It's not a hyperbole for us to say that all
of biology is footnote to Aristotle. He defined the field, outlined the
major problems, and accumulated data to provide answers - he set the
course."
J.A. Moore, 1993: p. 33
(Science as a way of knowing: the foundations of modern biology. Harvard
University Press)
Taxonomy - What's in a name?
Taxonomy is the scientific discipline that identifies, describes and
classifies the diversity of life. It is well-known that this science has
- at least in western societies - its founding roots in the thinking of
the Greek philosopher and naturalist Aristotle (384-322 BC). The
discipline has through the centuries evolved into a mature and
stimulating science that not only allows storage and retrieval of
information, but also hypothesis-driven reasoning on biodiversity issues
such as neo-extinctions, conservation, alien invasive species and
biosafety (see also the BioNET-International website "Why
taxonomy matters").
Taxonomy can roughly be divided in three complementary specialities.
- Alpha-taxonomy is concerned with identifying and describing the
basic units of Earth's diversity (the species) and in grouping these
into preliminary classifications (genera).
- Beta-taxonomy on the other hand is not primarily interested in the
discrimination of discrete taxonomic variation, but attempts to
construct hierarchical classifications that incorporate evolutionary
relationships.
- Gamma-taxonomy seeks to understand the processes that drive taxon
formation and evolution in general.
Clearly, these three branches are intimately inter-connected as
understanding how biodiversity naturally arises, evolves and disappears
is needed to recognise inter-and intra-specific variation, identify and
name its units and build meaningful (i.e. reflecting common descent)
classifications for them.
Enigmatically however, taxonomy - as the mother of all biological
sciences - has during the last century lost quite a bit of the cutting
edge splendour it previously lodged (especially in the eight-and
nineteenth century when protagonists such as Linnaeus, Cuvier, Lamarck,
Darwin, Wallace and Haeckel were active). The cause of this calamitous
state is not easy to trace, but can (at least partially) be attributed
to a fund-and brain drain to other more experimental, less-comparative,
disciplines (e.g. cytology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology and
ecology) in the first half of the twentieth century. However, with the
current realisation that large scale-habitat destruction and
overexploitation of natural resources result in unprecedented rates of
species-extinctions and co-occurring alterations in functioning and
redundancy of ecosystems, the need for sound taxonomic research is
acknowledged by virtually all conservationists. Yet, in the 21st century
the so-called taxonomic impediment, i.e. the lack of taxonomic
(inclusive of genetic) information, taxonomic and curatorial expertise
and infrastructure in many parts of the world, has become the Damocles
Sword above the heads of conservationists and policy makers. This
taxonomic impediment roughly plays at two levels:
- practising taxonomists and curators in developed countries, where
historically the bulk of taxonomic collections, infrastructure and
know-how have accumulated, currently suffer to a lesser or greater
extent from a lack of prestige and funds.
- practising taxonomists and curators in developing countries, where
more often than not the bulk of biodiversity is located, are
crippled by a lack of human, infrastructural and financial
resources.
The Convention on Biological Diversity and
the Establishment of the Global Taxonomy Initiative (GTI)
The 1992 Earth Summit in Rio De Janeiro gave birth the Convention
on Biological Diversity (CBD). The three goals of this convention -
conservation of biological diversity, sustainable use of its components,
and fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising from the use of
genetic resources - have become prime points on the political agenda of
most of the world's governments.
Given the fact that the CBD agreed to adopt an ecosystem approach rather
than the tactic to conserve only charismatic species or vegetation
types, taxonomic expertise and competence have become needed across all
taxonomic levels. However, already at the Second Meeting of the
Conference of the Parties (COP) to the CBD it was realized that
taxonomic (inclusive of genetic) information, taxonomic and curatorial
expertise and infrastructure are insufficient in many parts of the
world, especially in developing countries. Hence, such lack was
anticipated to be one of the key obstacles (political impotence of
biologists and scientific impotence of policy makers being other
impediments) in the implementation of the Convention, in particular of Article
7 on identification and monitoring.
In order to overcome this
taxonomic impediment, subsequent COP's endorsed consecutive SBSTTA
recommendations and established the Global
Taxonomy Initiative. During COP-6 an operational programme of work
for the GTI has been endorsed (COP
decision VI/8, paragraph 5). This programme of work not only sets
operative objectives, but also provides the rationale for the choice of
the operational targets. It was concluded that fast and successful
implementing of this programme of work will to a large extent depend on:
(i) coordinating it with existing national, regional and global
initiatives, partnerships and institutions such as, inter alia, the Global
Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and BioNET-INTERNATIONAL
and (ii) taxonomic capacity building at the national and regional
levels.
The programme of work of the GTI consists of five operational
objectives:
Operational objective 1:
Assess taxonomic needs and capacities at national, regional and global
levels for the implementation of the Convention.
Operational objective 2:
Provide focus to help build and maintain the human resources, systems
and infrastructure needed to obtain, collate and curate the biological
specimens that are the basis for taxonomic knowledge.
Operational objective 3:
Facilitate an improved and effective infrastructure/system for access to
taxonomic information; with priority on ensuring that countries of
origin gain access to information concerning elements of their
biodiversity.
Operational objective 4:
Within the major thematic work programmes of the Convention include key
taxonomic objectives to generate information needed for decision-making
in conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity and its
components.
Operational objective 5:
Within the work on cross-cutting issues of the Convention, include key
taxonomic objectives to generate information needed for decision-making
in conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity and its
components.
Concisely: The GTI aims to make taxonomic information, at all levels
of biodiversity (genetic, species and ecosystem) and for all organisms,
available in order to implement the three goals of the CBD.
The Belgian Focal Point to the Global Taxonomy Initiative
Background
As requested in COP
decision V/9, paragraph 4, Belgium has designated its Focal Point
for the GTI: the Royal
Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, (RBINS) in Brussels. This
museum and research institute harbours zoological collections (roughly
37 million specimens) and a library of global importance, well-equipped
research facilities and well-trained scientific and curatorial staff. It
is the largest of Belgium's high quality taxonomic research institutes.
It collaborates with other Belgian museums and institutes such as the Royal
Museum for Central Africa (Tervuren) and the National
Botanic Garden (Meise), as well as with universities and other
research institutes (see also http://bch-cbd.naturalsciences.be/belgium/biodiversity/actors/actors.htm
for complete list of Belgian actors in biodiversity research).
Objectives and Themes
"Rapid access to bad data is unacceptable; the
challenge is not merely to speed data access but to expedite taxonomic
research."
Wheeler, Raven & Wilson, Science
303: p. 285
The contribution of the Belgian
Development Cooperation (DGDC), through the Belgian Focal Point to
the GTI includes:
- Training in taxonomy and collection management. This tuition,
provided in collaboration with the Royal
Museum for Central Africa (Tervuren, Belgium), cuts across all
levels and aims at professional taxonomists, postgraduate, graduate
and undergraduate students, technicians and parataxonomists.
Training for the individual includes traditional and molecular
approaches to taxon identification and classification while
institutional support includes reference centre and website
development.
- Support for taxonomy based research projects.
- Valorisation of archives and collections relating to partner
countries.
- Creating public awareness and education.
- Provide scientific support to biodiversity related policy of
Belgian Development Cooperation.
To give impetus to some of these objectives the Belgian Focal Point
for the GTI launches two calls for proposals:
- Call for taxonomy-based individual and institutional capacity
building projects (external call, open to developing countries)
- Call for taxonomy-based research projects (internal call, open
only to research with RBINS promotor)
Through funding from the National Science Foundation PEET program
some grants to support three graduate students (one M.S. and two Ph.D.
or three Ph.D. students) at the University of Guam and University of
Florida are available. Read more about it
Our address:
Belgian Focal Point to the Global Taxonomy Initiative
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences
Rue Vautier 29
1000 Brussels
Belgium
Tel: +32 2 627 43 41
Fax: +32 2 627 41 41
Email: cbd-gti@naturalsciences.be
How to get there? See our access
maps.
Our team:
Dr. J. Van Goethem - Project promotor
Dr. A. Franklin - Project coordinator
Dr. Y. Samyn - GTI Tutor
Mr. A. Réveillon - Assistant tutor